This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Howle v GEC Power Engineering [1974] ICR 13

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 17:27

Judgement for the case Howle v GEC Power Engineering

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff had a personal grievance against his employer but was not allowed to be accompanied by someone from his union because it wasn’t recognised by the employer, whereas the other one, of which he was not a member, was recognised.

  • The court held that this policy was discriminatory against members of the unrecognised union. 

Sir Hugh Griffiths

An employer must grant the same organisational facilities to unions that he does not recognise as to those that he does.

If he fails to do so, he discriminates against workers who are members of the unrecognised unions.

  • There is a distinction between collective bargaining rights, which only have to be available to the recognised union, and individual rights where all unions have to be treated the same (based on legislation preceding TULRCA). 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Howle v GEC Power Engineering

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...