This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

International Fruit Company and others v Commission of the European [1971] ECR 411

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:14

Judgement for the case International Fruit Company and others v Commission of the European

Table Of Contents

  • Under a regulation the Community granted a certain number of licences to import fruit from outside the EU each week, leaving it to national agencies to inform commission of size of licences requested by each company, and the commission would then decide on the licences to grant to each imported.

  • Plaintiffs, apple importers, appealed against a rejection of their request for licences.

  • On the question of standing ECJ held that Plaintiffs’ complaints were admissible as they were concerned individually and directly as Article 230 requires. 

ECJ

The decisions on licensing must be regarded as a bunch of individual decisions taken by the Commission…which, though issued in the form of a regulation, each affects the legal position of one of the applicants for a licence.

  • Because the decisions are really made by the commission (whereas national agencies merely compile data and have no discretion themselves) they affect each Plaintiff directly. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on International Fruit Company and others v Commission of the European

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...