Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

InvercargillCity Council v Hamlin

[1996] AC 624

Case summary last updated at 18/01/2020 16:22 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case InvercargillCity Council v Hamlin

P employed X to build a house and the local council’s inspector, D, failed to point out defective foundations. These were discovered when P called in an expert and P sued D for the cost of repairs. Privy Council conceded that the NZ law, unlike English courts, does impose a duty of care on inspectors and upheld the verdict that P could not have discovered the defects reasonably before calling in the expert and therefore his cause of action accrued from this moment. There were no special limitations in NZ law on economic loss.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>