Plaintiff had an irreconcilable clash with his senior colleague and Defendant decided to dismiss him.
Plaintiff claimed that this was in breach of the disciplinary procedure incorporated into his contract (as part of the company blue book) and sought both a declaration that the dismissal was unlawful and an injunction not to dismiss Plaintiff prior to the full trial.
Warner J granted the injunction.
See 3 conditions for granting an injunction above (in Ewing article, as well as subsequent revision in Robb).
Here there was still complete confidence (since the employer was really just sacking Plaintiff in response to union pressure).
Damages would be inadequate, because if the interlocutory injunction preventing sacking were not granted then a full injunction (for reinstatement, etc.) wouldn’t be possible since the employment would have come to an end the notice period having finished.
Also Plaintiff would become unemployable with the NHS (who don’t rehire people who have been sacked).
Finally Plaintiff wouldn’t be able to use the facilities at the hospital for hi private patients.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Labour Law | Job Security Notes (15 pages) |
Labour Law | Wrongful Dismissal Notes (39 pages) |
Labour Law | Wrongful Dismissal Notes (26 pages) |