Defendant read out a speech at a public meeting which deliberately insulted the crowd assembled, causing chaos and disorder.
He was charged with using words likely to cause disorder contrary to the public order act.
The divisional court judged his words by reference to the crowd as he found it and NOT a “reasonable crowd”.
Says this does not represent an inroad into free speech.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.