Plaintiff was granted a license by Defendant to advertise on his building for a set period and Defendant agreed to do whatever was necessary to prevent anyone else advertising there.
Defendant then sold the building to X who refused to allow Plaintiff to advertise.
Plaintiff sued Defendant for breach of contract and HL awarded damages, holding that the agreement was merely a right in personam, NOT in rem, and therefore could only be enforced against Defendant.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Contract Law | Contract Law Problem Question Summary Notes (157 pages) |