Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783
Judgement for the case Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff had an equitable interest in a house, which her husband mortgaged to Defendant without telling her.
Issue was whether Defendant bought its rights subject to those of Plaintiff.
Court held that the bank had constructive notice of Plaintiff’s interest and therefore bought subject to it.
Judge John Finlay Q.C
Defendant ought to have made further checks than they in fact did to establish whether there were other interests in the property.
They failed to discharge this duty to make reasonable inquiries and therefore were put on constructive notice of Plaintiff’s interest.
For Further Study on Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.