Plaintiff was mining and Defendant approached them about a possible joint venture. During discussions Plaintiff revealed to Defendant that the adjacent plot of land had valuable oil deposits.
Plaintiff put in a bid and Defendant, using the info revealed to them by Plaintiff, outbid them and won the plot.
Supreme Court held Defendant was in breach of a duty not to misuse confidential information.
The appropriate remedy was the imposition upon the defendant of a constructive trust of the property.
The modern approach to CTs:
First, the court determines whether a claim for unjust enrichment is established, and then, secondly, examines whether in the circumstances a constructive trust is the appropriate remedy to redress that unjust enrichment.
He says that here a monetary award would be inadequate.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.