This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil [1994] 3 WLR 122

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:00

Judgement for the case Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil

Table Of Contents

  • X procured L to act in breach of a restrictive covenant that L had agreed with Plaintiff (not to sell shares without Plaintiff’s permission).

  • X then sold shares to Defendant, whom Plaintiff sued (along with all other parties).

  • However the court said that since Plaintiff had sought no injunction against X’s purchase of the shares from L nor Defendant’s purchase from X and therefore following that, the conduct was not unlawful. This was despite the tortious liability of X. 

Lord Hoffman

the defendant violates no legal right of the plaintiff if he makes himself judgment-proof by dissipating his assets before he is enjoined from doing so and he does not act unlawfully in failing to give disclosure before he is ordered to do so.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil

Trusts and Equity Notes
1,016 total pages
1811 purchased

Equity notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
749 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...