Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil

[1994] 3 WLR 122

Case summary last updated at 03/01/2020 18:50 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil

X procured L to act in breach of a restrictive covenant that L had agreed with P (not to sell shares without P’s permission). X then sold shares to D, whom P sued (along with all other parties). However the court said that since P had sought no injunction against X’s purchase of the shares from L nor D’s purchase from X and therefore following that, the conduct was not unlawful. This was despite the tortious liability of X. 
Lord Hoffman: “the defendant violates no legal right of the plaintiff if he makes himself judgment-proof by dissipating his assets before he is enjoined from doing so and he does not act unlawfully in failing to give disclosure before he is ordered to do so.” 

Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil crops up in following areas of law