After a three year delay, the claimant brought an action in tort against the defendant, who had accidentally driven over her legs in his car.
Under the Limitation Act 1980, a claim in negligence would be Statute-Barred, so the claimant sought to rely on a claim of Trespass To The Person. Historically, action in trespass did not require proof of an Intention to do the act that made up the trespass, merely that it was done directly.
However, by the time Letang was heard, there had been substantial developments in Negligence, and it was accepted that trespass was now distinguished from negligence by the motive of the defendant, not the directness of the act.
The action failed, therefore, because the proper form of action was in negligence, not tresspass, and this was statute barred.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.