Claimant was company which manufactured a breathalyser.
Defendant, former employee of Claimant, leaked documents to newspapers which allegedly showed the breathalyser was liable to commit serious errors which could lead to wrongful conviction.
On facts, disclosure was in public interest
I.e. as it affects life and liberty of a large number of citizens
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Ask questions š Get answers š It's simple šļøššļø
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Intellectual Property Law | Breach Of Confidence Cases (9 pages) |
Criminal Justice, Security, & Human Rights | Fair Trial Rights And Secret Evidence Notes (117 pages) |