Litster v Forth Dry Dock [1989] 1 All ER 1134
Judgement for the case Litster v Forth Dry Dock
Table Of Contents
This related to an unfair dismissal claim and some regulations enacted by parliament specifically to make the laws comply with an EC regulation.
Therefore the courts were to use purposive reasoning so that the regulations should be interpreted on the basis that they mean to be in compliance with EU directives and case decisions and, where necessary, this means inferring words or meanings that are not explicitly state in the directive.
For Further Study on Litster v Forth Dry Dock
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Labour Law | Sources And Scope Of Labour Law Notes (17 pages) |
| Labour Law | Unfair Dismissal Including Empirical Data Notes (44 pages) |
Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.