Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Liyanage and others v The Queen

[1967] 1 AC 259

Case summary last updated at 07/02/2020 15:02 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Liyanage and others v The Queen

The parliament of Ceylon made a law that retrospectively created new crimes so as to punish those who attempted a coup d’etat, saying it worked retrospectively and that it would cease to function as a law once court proceedings ended against the perpetrators of the coup d’etat. This act legalised holding Ds without warrant for arrest or trial for longer than the period allowed by law, altered the law of evidence so as to ensure their conviction and made admissible to the court statements made by them that would normally have been inadmissible AND it specified what punishments should be given to them. The Privy council (NB NOT binding on UK courts) rejected the argument that Ds should be acquitted on grounds of natural justice but did quash the convictions because the act of the Ceylon parliament usurped the judicial function of the courts, making a law specifically for punishing Ds, and thus breaching the separation of powers which was enshrined under the constitution of Ceylon.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Constitutional Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Constitutional Law Notes

Constitutional Law Notes >>