Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths

[1947] AC 1

Case summary last updated at 20/01/2020 16:40 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths

P was injured by X who was operating a crane. X was employed and the crane owned by D, who had let both to Y. P sued D and HL allowed P’s claim, saying that D was liable rather than Y. 
 
Lord Macmillan: it is possible for the general employer to show that the employee had been transferred the servant’s services for a particular occasion to another party, so as to make the other party liable, but the burden is on the general employer and here he had failed to show this. 

Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffiths crops up in following areas of law