Plaintiff, a property company, challenged the decision of a Rent Assessment Committee on the basis that Defendant, a member of the committee, had, as a solicitor, given rent advice to tenants of a close business associate of Plaintiff.
CA found for Plaintiff, holding that the facts were such as to give the reasonable impression that he was biased even though there was no actual bias on his part.
Accordingly the decision must be quashed and the case remitted to another assessment committee.Β
The court looks at the impression which would be given to other people. Even if he was as impartial as could be, nevertheless if right-minded persons would think that, in the circumstances, there was a real likelihood of bias on his part, then he should not sit. and if he does sit, his decision cannot stand.
It is irrelevant whether he was in fact biased, because βjustice is rooted in [public] confidence."
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Administrative Law | Standing Notes (43 pages) |