Metropolitan Water Bd v Dick Kerr [1918] AC 119
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:59
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Metropolitan Water Bd v Dick Kerr
Table Of Contents
Lord Dunedin
Held that the term regarding delays and difficulties “whatsoever and however occasioned” did not include indefinite delay.
It would be absurd to apply it to the present situation of a bar on further construction.
Lord Parmoor
Says indefinite postponement could not have been in the contemplation of the parties when making this clause.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Metropolitan Water Bd v Dick Kerr
1,511 total pages
747 purchased
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,511 total pages
747 purchased
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.