Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Midland Bank v Green

[1981] AC 513

Case summary last updated at 09/01/2020 19:54 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Midland Bank v Green

 A father granted to his son, P, a 10-year option to purchase his farm at a set price. Through the default of the P's solicitors the option was not registered as a Class C(iv) estate contract. D later conveyed the farm in 1967 to his wife, D at a vastly deflated cost so as to prevent P, with whom he had had an argument, from exercising his right. HL held that D was a purchaser within the meaning of the Land Registration Act and, following s.2 of the act, the charge was void against D. It denied that there was a BF requirement or a requirement that the purchaser provide adequate consideration. Wilberforce points out not only that BF is not required under the act, but also that to include it would produce immense difficulties e.g. examination of the buyer’s and seller’s motives. 

Midland Bank v Green crops up in following areas of law