Judgement for the case R v Miller
FACTS
A tramp accidentally set a mattress on fire and rather than putting it out, left it and moved to another room.
JUDGEMENT
By the time that someone becomes aware of a mistake that they themselves have made, then they have a duty to resolve the problem, referring to the Criminal Damage Act.
He also points out that the action should be taken as a whole action, so that one cannot object that the actus reus and mens rea do not coincide.
The tramp is not in the position of someone who happens to chance upon a fire, and he is bound because he himself started the fire.
For Further Study on R v Miller
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal Law | Actus Reus — Omissions And Causation Notes (25 pages) |
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.