Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Noakes v Rice

[1902] AC 24

Case summary last updated at 09/01/2020 17:56 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Noakes v Rice

P, a mortgagor, was a pub, and agreed to purchase all alcohol from D, mortgagee, even once no more money was owing. The HL said that collateral advantages are invalid where they represent a clog on the right of redemption and, having paid off the debt, P was entitled to have the security interest returned to them and were not bound by the term requiring exclusive purchasing from D. 
Lord Macnaghten: Redemption is inherent to a mortgage, and therefore, once the debt has been repaid the land “as free and unfettered to all intents and purposes as if the land had never been made the subject of the security”. 
Lord Davey: “Once a mortgage always a mortgage and nothing but a mortgage”. Hence no clog or fetter on the right to redeem is valid. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Land Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Land Law Notes

Land Law Notes >>