Case involved a very complex brawl.
The outcome from the CA was that it is for the jury to decide if the action went beyond the scope of the JCV and that a joint enterprise could occur on the spur of the moment taking into account the relevant knowledge of the defendants, e.g. a fight erupts and in that fight a few people decide to kill V.
In deciding if Defendant had withdrawn from the JCV they should ask whether he was “still in it,” e.g. where a group of people are attacking V, if Defendant was still present and encouraging them then he was clearly “still in it” (as in this case).
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.