This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties [1974] 1 WLR 1335

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:59

Judgement for the case Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant sold an object to Plaintiff through an auction, one of the conditions being that the agent/auctioneer had no authority to make representations.

  • When a representation by the auctioneer turned out to be false, Plaintiff attempted to rescind the contract.

  • The court (Brightman J) said that agents were entitled to limit the authority of their agents and such clauses are not invalidated by s.3 of the Misrepresentations Act. 

----

NB At the time the Unfair Contracts Act had not yet been introduced so s.3 permitted exemption or limitation clauses that were “fair and reasonable” rather than those which were reasonable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act. However, the test under UCTA is no harder to satisfy than this one. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties

Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
747 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
747 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...