Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Palmer v R

[1971] AC 814

Case summary last updated at 11/01/2020 18:18 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Palmer v R

Ds had killed someone and were arguing to the Privy Council that, where D intended self-defence but used excessive force and killed V, the jury should be directed towards manslaughter and not murder. Privy Council rejected this appeal. Lord Morris said that the defence of self-defence is a relatively simple one based not only on law but on common sense. Thus either it applied or it did not- it was not open as a partial defence where the necessary criteria had not been fulfilled by D. Lord Morris also referred to cases of “unexpected anguish”. He said “If a jury thought that in a moment of unexpected anguish a person attacked had only done what he honestly and instinctively thought was necessary, that would be most potent evidence that only reasonable defensive action had been taken”. This is a qualification to the objective self-defence test of “reasonableness”. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>