Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd

[2002] Case C-299/99

Case summary last updated at 31/01/2020 15:57 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd

Philips was previously the monopoly supplier of three-headed shavers to UK market. Sought to register three-headed shape as a trade mark. In light of problems due to lack of distinctiveness, Philips claimed product had acquired distinctiveness through us. Held:
·       Fact that Philips had monopoly does not stop the sign having become distinctive through use.
·       However even if public recognise sign, has only become distinctive:
1)     if public see it as indicating COMMERCIAL origin
2)     and if its prior use was as a trade mark
-        i.e. even if three-headed shaver was associated with Philips, must be shown that this was through it having been used as a trade mark
-        and not simply because the public liked the shape of the head
·       Left to national court to decide.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>