Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


R v Aitken

[1992] 95 Cr App R 304

Case summary last updated at 14/01/2020 18:33 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Aitken

 Some RAF pilots were taking part in horseplay to which V consented. During the horseplay he received serious burns. The judge gave directions on “maliciously” (if the Ds foresaw some harm) but did not direct on what was meant by “unlawful” except that it was beyond horseplay. Ds were convicted of GBH under s.20. CA allowed their appeals on the basis that D did consent and that consent to undisciplined, rough horseplay, such as that which V had been involved in throughout the night, was not itself unlawful. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>