R v Allen [1988] Crim LR 698
Judgement for the case R v Allen
Table Of Contents
A was charged with indecent assault.
-
In defence he claimed that he had:
Not realised how high the alcohol content was of is drink so that he was not to blame for his drunkenness, and
That his drunkenness excused his action.
The court ruled that the trial judge had been right not to leave the 2nd argument with the jury (Majewski makes it an unacceptable line of argument), while he was responsible to know exactly what he was drinking.
For Further Study on R v Allen
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal Law | Defences Notes (32 pages) |
| BPTC Criminal Litigation | Evidence At Trial And Types Of Evidence Notes (25 pages) |
| Criminal Law | Intoxication Notes (3 pages) |
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.