Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v Allen

[1988] Crim LR 698

Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 07:42 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Allen

A was charged with indecent assault. In defence he claimed that he had 1) not realised how high the alcohol content was of is drink so that he was not to blame for his drunkenness, and 2) that his drunkenness excused his action. The court ruled that the trial judge had been right not to leave the 2nd argument with the jury (Majewski makes it an unacceptable line of argument), while he was responsible to know exactly what he was drinking. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>