Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v Byrne

[1960] 2 QB 396

Case summary last updated at 11/01/2020 15:39 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Byrne

 A man raped, killed and mutilated a girl and pleaded diminished responsibility so that he should be guilty of manslaughter, not murder. The judge directed that if he was normal but on this occassion felt an abnormal sexual impulse that was hard to resist, the “diminished responsibility plea” did not apply. He was convicted of murder. Medical evidence said that Byrne was a sexual psychopath whose behaviour became impossible to control when driven by sexual desires, but not under normal circumstances. The Homicide Act 1957 says that the accused must show that he was suffering from an abnormality of mind which was induced by disease, injury retarded development etc, and was such that it impaired his mental responsibility for his acts in killing/ helping a killing. Appeal said that the defendant satisfied these conditions at the time of the murder and the trial judge’s direction was wrong. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>