This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

R v Conway [1989] QB 290

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03

Judgement for the case R v Conway

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant was convicted of dangerous driving when he was trying to escape attackers, in reasonable fear for the safety of himself and his passenger.

  • Judge did not put a direction of necessity.

  • CA said the judge ought to have directed that there was a possible defence of “duress of circumstances”.

Lord Woolf

  • Defines duress of circumstances in this case as:

Where the defendant was compelled by circumstances to do as he did to avoid death or serious bodily harm to himself or some other person.

  • Lord Woolf also said, importantly:

Whether 'duress of circumstances' is called 'duress' or 'necessity' does not matter.

What is important is that, whatever it is called, it is subject to the same limitations as the 'do this or else' species of duress.

  • i.e. objectively “reasonable” belief in danger.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on R v Conway

GDL Criminal Law Notes
551 total pages
76 purchased

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...

Criminal Law Notes
1,072 total pages
662 purchased

Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Criminal LawDefences Notes (32 pages)
Criminal LawDefences Short Notes (28 pages)
GDL Criminal LawDuress Notes (5 pages)
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Criminal Law Notes
1,072 total pages
662 purchased

Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...