Defendant was convicted of dangerous driving when he was trying to escape attackers, in reasonable fear for the safety of himself and his passenger.
Judge did not put a direction of necessity.
CA said the judge ought to have directed that there was a possible defence of “duress of circumstances”.
Defines duress of circumstances in this case as:
Where the defendant was compelled by circumstances to do as he did to avoid death or serious bodily harm to himself or some other person.
Lord Woolf also said, importantly:
Whether 'duress of circumstances' is called 'duress' or 'necessity' does not matter.
What is important is that, whatever it is called, it is subject to the same limitations as the 'do this or else' species of duress.
i.e. objectively “reasonable” belief in danger.
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Criminal Law | Defences Notes (32 pages) |
Criminal Law | Defences Short Notes (28 pages) |
GDL Criminal Law | Duress Notes (5 pages) |