Law Cases > Administrative Law Cases > Standing and Sufficient Interest Cases

R v Foreign Secretary, ex parte Rees-Mogg

[1994] QB 552

Case summary last updated at 08/01/2020 14:08 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Foreign Secretary, ex parte Rees-Mogg

P tried to seek judicial review of D’s decision to ratify the Maastricht treaty. The court refused, saying that it didn’t have the jurisdiction to review the signing of treaties.

Lloyd LJ: No arguments arose about standing. Suffice to say “we accept without question that Lord Rees-Mogg brings the proceedings because of his sincere concern for constitutional issues.” He endorses what Slade LJ said in Smedley

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
Covers all major cases for LLB exams
Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
Recently updated

Administrative Law Notes >>

Administrative Law Notes