R v Foreign Secretary, ex parte Rees-Mogg [1994] QB 552
Judgement for the case R v Foreign Secretary, ex parte Rees-Mogg
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff tried to seek judicial review of Defendant’s decision to ratify the Maastricht treaty.
The court refused, saying that it didn’t have the jurisdiction to review the signing of treaties.
Lloyd LJ
No arguments arose about standing.
Suffice to say “we accept without question that Lord Rees-Mogg brings the proceedings because of his sincere concern for constitutional issues.”
He endorses what Slade LJ said in Smedley
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on R v Foreign Secretary, ex parte Rees-Mogg
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Administrative Law | Discretion Wednesbury Proportionality Notes (58 pages) |
| Administrative Law | Jurisdiction Notes (26 pages) |
| Administrative Law | Standing Notes (43 pages) |
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.