Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v Kimber

[1983] 1 W.L.R. 1118

Case summary last updated at 14/01/2020 19:30 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Kimber

D indecently touched V, a patient in a mental hospital, without caring whether or not she consented. CA said that D “couldn’t care less” i.e. didn’t even consider her feelings- NB Caldwell recklessness applied at the time so, on this basis, D was found guilty. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>