R v Kimber [1983] 1 W.L.R. 1118
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case R v Kimber
Table Of Contents
Defendant indecently touched Victim, a patient in a mental hospital, without caring whether or not she consented.
CA said that Defendant “couldn’t care less," i.e. didn’t even consider her feelings - NB Caldwell recklessness applied at the time so, on this basis, Defendant was found guilty.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on R v Kimber
1,067 total pages
383 purchased
Medical Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridg...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Medical Law | Negligence In Clinical Medicine Notes (19 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,072 total pages
662 purchased
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.