Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd

[1993] 1 WLR 23 HL

Case summary last updated at 07/01/2020 18:42 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd

P was a bus company that bought out some rivals. The Commission was entitled to hold an investigation into a company if, under the Fair Trading Act, the area concerned was a “substantial part of the United Kingdom”. The commission investigated P, interpreting “substantial” to mean something “more than merely nominal”. HL held that this was a correct interpretation and therefore there were no grounds for judicial review. 
 
Lord Mustill: Unclear judgment (B,M&E): At one point he suggests that if the commission got the meaning broadly right then the courts wouldn’t interfere, suggesting that jurisdiction isn’t hard-edged. He seemed to say that the court could only overturn the interpretation of the commission if it was not one of a range of acceptable interpretations. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>