Re a Company [1987] 1 BCLC 82
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:12
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Re a Company
Table Of Contents
Hoffmann J
Where director allots shares solely for purpose of destroying a majority, the main basis of action is the wrong to shareholders, and not the wrong to company
This because members’ individual rights under articles have been infringed.
Thus members have personal right of action.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Re a Company
805 total pages
1075 purchased
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Company law | Derivative Action & Ratification Of Breaches Of Duty Notes (28 pages) |
| Company law | Minority Rights And Remedies Cases (9 pages) |
| Company law | Shareholder Remedies Notes (15 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
805 total pages
1075 purchased
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.