Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Re Northern Engineering

[1994] 2 BCLC 704 (CA)

Case summary last updated at 23/01/2020 15:18 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Re Northern Engineering

Company’s articles provided that any reduction in capital would be a variation in class rights of the preference shares. D claimed that consent of class of preference shareholders was not required as a ‘reduction’ for purposes of articles did not include ‘cancellation’. Held:
 
·       ‘Reduction’ did include a ‘cancellation’
·       Therefore consent of class of non-preference shareholders was required
Ø  This even though in event company had not made specific provision, consent of class would not have been required.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>