Company issued new shares.
To ensure continuity of management, was decided to double voting rights on shares owned by managers so that they retained same degree of control.
Resolution was challenged.
Majority believed in good faith that it was in interests of company for management to retain control.
Therefore was no oppression involved.
Objective test. Did not matter that certain shareholders stood to benefit from the resolution, as those who had supported it genuinely believed it was in interests of company.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.