Rysaffe Trustee Co v IRC [2003] EWCA Civ 356
Judgement for the case Rysaffe Trustee Co v IRC
Table Of Contents
S43 does not change the law of trusts. Cannot change 5 separate trusts into a single settlement.
Could not be treated as associated operations - only if all contribute to overall transfer of value, but not where each and every one of them already constitutes a transfer of value in and of itself.
-
A taxpayer established 5 mirror discretionary settlements - in each case Bs and Ts were the same.
Each comprised £10 and private co shares were subsequently added to each trust.
The settlements were dated on different days.
Park J
The practical operation of the associated operations provisions is comparatively limited.
It is not some sort of catch-all anti-avoidance provision which can be invoked to nullify the effectiveness of any scheme or structure which can be said to have involved more than one operation and which was intended to avoid or reduce IHT.
For Further Study on Rysaffe Trustee Co v IRC
Taxation Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Tax Law | Income Tax Notes (12 pages) |
| Tax Law | Inheritance Tax Notes (14 pages) |
Taxation Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.