This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Sidebottom v Kershaw [1920] 1 Ch 154

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:05

Judgement for the case Sidebottom v Kershaw

Table Of Contents

  • Company altered its articles by adding provision allowing directors the power to buy out, at a fair price, any shareholder who competed with the business of the company.

  • A minority shareholder, who carried out a competing business, challenged alteration.

Held

  • Is entirely for benefit of company that members who compete with company be bought out

    • I.e. if they are members, more likely that they will get benefit of information which will help them compete with company. 

  • Thus alteration is valid.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Sidebottom v Kershaw

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Company law Notes
805 total pages
1075 purchased

Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...