Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66
Country:
United Kingdom
KEY POINTS
- The serious harm test necessitates the claimant to provide factual evidence, based on the balance of probabilities, that the statement in question has caused or is likely to cause significant damage to the claimant's reputation. Mere emotional distress or hurt feelings alone do not meet the required standard.
- The claimant has the option to present evidence to support the claim of serious harm, while the defendant may offer evidence to demonstrate that no serious harm has taken place or is anticipated. Nevertheless, the court, like in all cases, has the right to draw conclusions based on the evidence admitted.
- In situations where highly defamatory allegations are published in mass media, the requirement for evidence of serious harm may be obviated. However, it is essential to note that the issue of serious harm is not solely determined by the volume of publications or the number of people affected; it involves a careful assessment of the overall impact on the claimant's reputation.
FACTS
- This is a libel claim brought by Alvaro Sobrinho against Impresa Publishing SA, the publisher of the weekly newspaper "Expresso" in Portugal. The article in question made allegations against Mr. Sobrinho, a prominent international banker. Mr. Sobrinho brought libel proceedings in England, seeking a retraction and apology for the defamatory content.
- After some pre-action correspondence, Mr. Sobrinho commenced libel proceedings in England, while a criminal complaint for libel was lodged in Portugal. However, due to the collapse of Banco Espirito Santo (BES), where Mr. Sobrinho was formerly employed, and extensive media coverage of the parliamentary inquiry into the bank's collapse, Mr. Sobrinho decided to discontinue the civil proceedings in Portugal.
- Mr. Sobrinho argued that the extensive coverage of the parliamentary inquiry in Portugal clarified the situation and vindicated him, leading to the discontinuation of the libel proceedings in that jurisdiction. The libel claim in England focused on the publication of the article in the "Expresso" newspaper and its impact on Mr. Sobrinho’s reputation.
- The court has to determine the extent to which damages were sought for the publication in England in the context of the broader events in Portugal.
For further study on Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA
Aspects Of Obligations notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes cover all the major LLB aspects cases ...
COMMENTARY
- The court's interpretation of the serious harm requirement offers valuable guidance for future defamation cases, emphasising the need for concrete evidence of significant damage to the claimant's reputation.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
- 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
- Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Premium study materials available for review
Tort Law
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
853 purchased
1,070
pages
Similar cases
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
The law makes a clear distinction between two types of defamation, namely: Actionable per se , which includes all libels and two specific types of slander (formerly four), and Defamation actionable o...
Lewis v Daily Telegraph
Defendant ran a headline that Plaintiff (a company) had been investigated over financial dealings by the police. HL sent the case for retrial after the trial judge had failed to consider whether Plai...
Tolstoy v United Kingdom
Plaintiff was successfully sued for libel when he published a pamphlet claiming that X had been involved in bad treatment of Prisoners of War (POWs). He was restricted from publishing material with “...
Morgan v Odhams Press
The claimant bought an action against the defendant newspaper in defamation. The newspaper article claimed that a young woman had been kidnapped by a dog-doping gang. At about the time of the kidnapp...
Byrne v Deane
This case arose from a controversy around the owners' failure to promptly remove a specific notice despite its potentially damaging contents. The notice hinted at reporting certain wrongful acts to t...
Related product samples
Need instant answers? Our
AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across
all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.