Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Strand Securities v Caswell

[1965] Ch 958

Case summary last updated at 09/01/2020 20:26 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Strand Securities v Caswell

D had a sub-lease for over 21 years and which ought to have been registered but was not, and therefore was void unless it was an overriding interest. He did not live there himself but let X live there rent-free. When the main lease was sold to P, P claimed to have bought without being subject to D’s lease (even though they had been given notice of it). CA held that D was not in actual possession and therefore did not have an overriding interest. 

Lord Denning MR: If there is an overriding interest and the purchaser knows/ought to know through reasonable investigation of the occupier’s rights, then the actual occupier/person in receipt of rents or profits is protected. D was not in actual occupation (since neither he nor his agents were physically there) while he was not in receipt of rents, since X lived there for free. He acknowledges oddness of conclusion. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Land Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Land Law Notes

Land Law Notes >>