This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Street v Mountford [1986] Conv 39

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:01

Judgement for the case Street v Mountford

KEY POINTS

  • A lease (tenancy) is characterized by exclusive possession. The likelihood of it being categorized as a lease increases if someone has sole possession of the property.

  • “An occupier of residential accommodation at a rent for a term is either a lodger or a tenant. The occupier is a lodger if the landlord provides attendance or services which require the landlord or his servants to exercise unrestricted access to and use of the premises. A lodger is entitled to live in the premises but cannot call the place his own.” (Lord Templeman)

FACTS

  • Mr. Street allowed Mrs. Mountford to occupy rooms 5 and 6 at 5 St. Clements Gardens, Boscombe, under an agreement that started on March 7, 1983.

  • Mrs. Mountford agreed to pay £37.00 per week, and the agreement could be terminated with 14 days' written notice.

  • The central question in this appeal was whether the agreement constituted a tenancy or a license.

JUDGEMENT

  • Appeal allowed.

COMMENTARY

  • This case provided clarity on the key factors distinguishing leases from licenses, with a strong focus on exclusive possession and established a framework for assessing the nature of occupancy rights, which remains a cornerstone in property law.

ORIGINAL ANALYSIS

  • Defendant granted Plaintiff a right to exclusively occupy a house at a weekly rent, terminable on 14 days notice, and which purported to be a licence. 

  • HL held that where, as here, residential accommodation had been granted for a term at a rent with exclusive possession, the grantor providing neither attendance nor services, the legal consequence was the creation of a tenancy. This is regardless of incorrect labelling. 

Lord Templeman

  • Unrestricted access of the landlord or his servants to the property means that the occupier will be a lodger, and not a tenant, since there is no exclusive possession. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Street v Mountford

GDL Land Law Notes
556 total pages
133 purchased

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...

Land Law Notes
987 total pages
1286 purchased

Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Land Law Notes
987 total pages
1286 purchased

Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...