Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Tesco Stores Ltd v Pollard

[2006] EWCA Civ 393

Case summary last updated at 20/01/2020 16:14 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Tesco Stores Ltd v Pollard

P (a child) was a ble to open what was supposed to be a child-resistant bottle of washing powder sold by Tesco’s and the bottle manufactured by another company (D1 and D2). P ate the powder and was ill and Ds were sued on his behalf. The company found D1 and D2 liable under the 1987 Act.
Laws LJ: The case came down to s.3(1) of the act, that “There is a defect in a product for the purposes of this Part if the safety of the product is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect …” Here, the public were entitled to expect that the bottle would be ,more difficult to open than a standard bottle top, which it was. Therefore the product was not defective. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>