This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Ticehurst v BT [1992] IRLR 219

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 06:48

Judgement for the case Ticehurst v BT

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff, a manager and union member, took part in a go-slow and then strike as part of industrial action.

    • The employer said that any employee who was not prepared to keep to their contract in full would be sent home without pay.

    • Plaintiff refused to sign an undertaking saying that from now on (i.e. after the strikes of the previous days) she was prepared to perform her contractual obligations fully and so was sent home without pay.

  • She sued Defendant, arguing that she had been willing to work and so the employer owed her pay.

  • CA dismissed her claim, holding that she had withdrawn her goodwill.

Ralph Gibson

  • An employment contract for a manager contained an implied term / duty to serve the employer faithfully, which she had breached.

  • Since she was only willing to offer partial performance (working but without goodwill / serving her employer faithfully) the employer was entitled to refuse and bring the contract to an end. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Ticehurst v BT

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Labour LawContract Of Employment Notes (31 pages)
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...