This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Tolley v Fry [1931] AC 333

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03

Judgement for the case Tolley v Fry

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff was an amateur golfer and Defendant depicted him as though endorsing Defendant’s product, which was against the rules of amateur golf.

  • Plaintiff sued Defendant and HL found for him, accepting that the implication that he broke the rules was damaging to his reputation. This was the case even though the message was brought about by innuendo rather than explicit statement. 

Lord Hailsham

  • Whether a publication defames depends on “the inference which would be drawn by the ordinary man or woman from the facts of the publication”.

Lord Dunedin

  • The circumstances, not solely the words, surrounding the publication are taken into account in determining whether it is capable of libellous meaning.

  • He sums up the case as:

(1.) Would the caricature associated with the advertisement admit of a reasonable inference that the plaintiff had assented to be so depicted? That depends on the view taken of the picture, of its surroundings, and of its use.

(2.) If that inference were drawn would it be deleterious to the plaintiff's position as an amateur golfer, and to do him harm?

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Tolley v Fry

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
845 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...