Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Tool Metal v Tungsten Electric

[1955] 1 WLR 761 (H.L.)

Case summary last updated at 02/01/2020 12:57 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Tool Metal v Tungsten Electric

 D had to pay P royalties for creating and selling its product, and paying compensation when it produced in excess of a certain volume. The right to compensation was suspended during WWII and P tried to reinstate it in 1945. The HL ruled that “reasonable notice” had to be given in order to resume strict legal contractual rights. This was determined basically on account of what would be “equitable” i.e. fair. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>