Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669
Judgement for the case Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC
Table Of Contents
Lord BW
-
He disagrees with the decision in Chase
It was based on a concept of retaining an equitable property in money where, prior to the payment to the recipient bank, there was no existing equitable interest
I cannot understand how the recipient's "conscience" can be affected at a time when he is not aware of any mistake
-
The judge found that the law of England and that of New York were in substance the same.
WRONG: NYC uses a remedial CT whereas English law only recognises an institutional CT.
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC
Equity notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
These are detailed case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrase...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL | Kleinwort Benson V. Lincoln City Council Notes (17 pages) |
| Trusts and Equity | Tracing Notes (34 pages) |
Equity notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.