Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Whitgift v Stocks

[2001] EWCA Civ 1732

Case summary last updated at 08/01/2020 18:57 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Whitgift v Stocks

 P, a property developer, sold off a property to D’s predecessor subject to restrictive covenants. P then wished to breach the restrictive covenants and D resisted. CA denied D’s claim to enforce via annexation, but allowed it on the basis of the “building scheme” basis. 
Jonathan Parker LJ (He gives definition of annexation and building scheme): “A restrictive covenant affecting freehold land is enforceable between parties other than the original covenantor and the original covenantee if the party seeking to enforce it is entitled to the benefit of it and the party against whom it is sought to be enforced is subject to the burden of it.” Burden can exist if the covenantor’s successor had notice of it upon purchase. Benefit can exist when the covenant “touches and concerns” the covenantee’s successor’s land and has been assigned to him personally or has been annexed to his land. “Annexation” in this sense can only occur in circumstances where the land to which the benefit of the covenant is said to be annexed was in the ownership of the original covenantee at the date when the covenant was entered into. Thus the effect of annexation in a case where the developer of an estate sells off the various developed plots subject to restrictive covenants is that the first purchaser will not be able to enforce the covenants entered into by the purchasers of any of the other plots, whereas the last purchaser will be able to enforce the covenants entered into by all the other purchasers. In a scheme under which similar restrictive covenants imposed on a number of properties in a defined area are mutually and reciprocally enforceable as between the respective owners for the time being of those properties (commonly referred to as a “building scheme”), then the owner for the time being of each of those properties will be able to enforce the covenants against the owners for the time being of each of the other properties subject to the scheme. Thus, in the case of an estate which is sold off by a developer in various plots, the owner for the time being of each plot will be able to enforce the covenants against the owners for the time being of all the other plots, regardless of whether such plots were sold off by the developer before or after his own plot. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Land Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Land Law Notes

Land Law Notes >>