Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

X v Bedfordshire

[1995] 3 All ER 353

Case summary last updated at 18/01/2020 19:53 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case X v Bedfordshire

LAs erroneously took children into care, exercising powers under statute. Both the children and their parents sued for negligence. HL denied the claim, saying that for the act of a public authority to be liable in tort it had to be justiciable. This would only be the case if (1) the impugned decision did not involve a weighing up of public interests, which it was the role of parliament and public bodies to do ,(2) the decision was ultra vires, and (3) the impugned action was ‘operational’ (i.e. didn’t involve the exercise of discretion) rather than being one of ‘policy’ (i.e. involving discretion) 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>