This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

X v Bedfordshire [1995] 3 All ER 353

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03

Judgement for the case X v Bedfordshire

Table Of Contents

  • LAs erroneously took children into care, exercising powers under statute.

  • Both the children and their parents sued for negligence.

  • HL denied the claim, saying that for the act of a public authority to be liable in tort it had to be justiciable.

  • This would only be the case if:

    1. The impugned decision did not involve a weighing up of public interests, which it was the role of parliament and public bodies to do,

    2. The decision was ultra vires, and

    3. The impugned action was ‘operational’ (i.e. didn’t involve the exercise of discretion) rather than being one of ‘policy’ (i.e. involving discretion) 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on X v Bedfordshire

Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
849 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...

GDL Tort Law Notes
591 total pages
90 purchased

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
849 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...