LAs erroneously took children into care, exercising powers under statute.
Both the children and their parents sued for negligence.
HL denied the claim, saying that for the act of a public authority to be liable in tort it had to be justiciable.
This would only be the case if:
The impugned decision did not involve a weighing up of public interests, which it was the role of parliament and public bodies to do,
The decision was ultra vires, and
The impugned action was ‘operational’ (i.e. didn’t involve the exercise of discretion) rather than being one of ‘policy’ (i.e. involving discretion)
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
GDL Tort Law | Negligence Public Authorities Notes (5 pages) |
Tort Law | Omissions Liability Notes (4 pages) |