BCL Law Notes > Oxford BCL Law Notes > Comparative Public Law Notes

Process Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 5 page long Process notes, which we sell as part of the Comparative Public Law Notes collection, a 70 package written at Oxford in 2016 that contains (approximately) 465 pages of notes across 109 different documents.

Learn more about our Comparative Public Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Process Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Comparative Public Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Lecture 2: Process

ProcessContent licability of Trigger/app Rationale processSources of

EU

UK

Lisbon Treaty (TEU + TFEU)
 Common law from 17th century onwards o Duty to give reasons: art 296 o Modified ultra vires v common law o Publication theories
 Limited statute o Access to documents
 Not markedly different from UK
 Similar instrumental & non-instrumental rationales to EU
 Two rationales
 Judges more openly reflect on underlyin o Instrumental rationale: more likely to reach correct rationale - even if not in terms conclusion on substance of case Depends on the source.
 Must show some right, interest or legitim
 Treaty  treaty article will provide trigger expectation justifying some process righ o Eg duty to give reasons - applies to every form of
 General approach is for liberal interpret action taken by Community: incl primary, secondary rights, interests falling short of rights, an
 Legislation setting out code  set out in the Code
 Appears to reflect balancing exercise in o Can be supplemented by general principles Matthews v Elridge (US): o Importance of interest infringed
 Treaty / general principles of law  determined by the Court o Likely value of additional process r o Rules vary according to subject-matter
 Link between process rights & substantive review - Process rights reinforce substantive review o Duty to give reasons - facilitates proportionality / rationality review by making reasons for decision transparent o "Duty of diligent examination" - duty on administration on the cusp of procedural / substantive revie

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Comparative Public Law Notes.