Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Skeleton Argument Specific Disclosure Notes

BPTC Law Notes > Civil Advocacy Notes

This is an extract of our Skeleton Argument Specific Disclosure document, which we sell as part of our Civil Advocacy Notes collection written by the top tier of City Law School students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Civil Advocacy Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT GUILDFORD Claim No. AYJ7216 BETWEEN: MARK PEMBERTON Claimant
-andGEOFF SHORT (trading as QUALITY WINDOWS) Defendant _________________________________________________________________________ SKELETON ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CLAIMANT RE: SPECIFIC DISCLOSURE _________________________________________________________________________

Introductory Matters

1. This is an application brought by the Claimant Mr. Mark Pemberton ("C") against the Defendant, Mr. Geoff Short ("D") for specific disclosure pursuant to CPR r.31.12. C contends that D's purported compliance with his disclosure duties has been unacceptably inadequate (PD31, para 5.1). Evidence in support

2. C will rely on the following in making this application: a. Particulars of Claim ("PoC") b. Application Notice, dated 6 February 2017 c. Witness Statement of Emma Hart ("WS/EH") and Exhibit EH1 d. Witness Statement of Geoff Short ("WS/GS") and Exhibit GS 3 History giving rise to the claim

3. D contracted to design, manufacture and install 20 Georgian-style window and door units at C's home 'Prandergast', Windmill Lane, Ockhurst, Surrey ("the Property") on 17 April 2016. The oral agreement incorporated terms from previous discussions on 2 1

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Civil Advocacy Notes.