GDL Law Notes GDL English Legal System Notes
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through applications from top students and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of GDL notes available in the UK this year....
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL English Legal System Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
_______________________________________________________
The judges
Rule of law: judges must be completely impartial, allowing no preference
Human Rights Act 1998: increased powers of the judges to control work of parliament & the executive through judicial review
A and X and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2004: HL decision that Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was in breach of HRA 1998. The conflicting provisions were then repealed.
Constitutional Reform Act 2005: put President of the Courts of England and Wales is head of judiciary (used to be Lord Chancellor). In practice this is the Lord Chief Justice, who is head of all courts up to CA (where s/he will almost definitely choose to sit)
Role:
Represent views of the judiciary to Parliament & executive
Manage the judiciary in terms of welfare, training, work schedules etc
Hierarchy:
Justice of the Supreme Court
12 Justices of the Supreme Court sit in SC and PC
Lord Chief Justice
President of the Courts of England & Wales
President of CA Crim.
Master of the Rolls
President of CA Civ.
Lord Justice of Appeal
38 Lord Justices of Appeal who sit in CA (referred to as Lord Justice____, written ____ LJ)
High Court judge
108 High Court/puisne judges sitting in HC & CC for most serious criminal offences (referred to as Mr Justice_____, written as _____ J)
Circuit judges
Travel around sitting in county court and middle-ranking CC cases
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 gives circuit judges limited opportunity to sit in CA Crim.
District judges
HC & county
District judge (magistrates)
Used to be called stipendiary magistrates; work in magistrates’ court
Recorders
Hear less serious CC cases & county court; part-time judges
Assistant recorders
Drafted in when volume at highest for minor cases
Judicial appointment:
Secret soundings: the old system which was likened to an ‘old boys’ network’ by the Law Society
Courts and Legal Services Act 1990: allowed solicitors entry into the judiciary (though currently only 1 HC judge has roots as a solicitor)
Constitutional Reform Act 2005: radically reformed how judges are appointed in line with Labour's Constitutional Reform: a new way of appointing judges 2003
Established Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) to reinforce judicial independence; majority of members of JAC must not be judges:
High Court judges & below:
JAC recommends one individual for each vacancy
Lord Chief Justice officially appoints the judges below the High Court
Lord Chancellor appoints High Court and above
(have to have been recommended by JAC; Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor can ask for a candidate to be reconsidered by JAC)
Lords Justice of Appeal formally made by the Queen on advice of the Prime Minister, after JAC has recommended to PM
Appointments outside of JAC control:
Supreme Court judges not recommended by JAC:
When there is a vacancy Minister appoints a temporary Commission of at least 5 members (including at least 1 incumbent judge of Supreme Court, 1 person without legal qualifications, and 1 member of each of the legal appointing authorities for England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland)
Temporary Commission puts forward between 2 and 5 candidates to Minister
Usually a judge with experience in CA, though Jonathan Sumption is first example of a senior barrister appointment
Minister then consults senior judges, First Ministers of Scotland and Northern Ireland, and head of Welsh assembly
PM then given one name by Minister who recommends this to the Queen
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: removed requirement of experience of judging in a lower court in order to become a judge - widening the net (also in terms of the qualification needed – e.g. legal executives and government lawyers now allowed)
Crime and Courts Act 2013: where two candidates are of equal merit, JAC must prefer minority background
Wigs:
From 2008 civil cases don't require the judge to wear a wig
Criminal case do - provides a level of anonymity
Pay:
174,000 at High Court level
Financial attraction to a barrister: security of a pensionable position
Dismissal:
For High Court and above this requires vote in both houses, then formally removed by the Queen; to protect judicial independence
Courts Act 1971: circuit judges and district judges can be dismissed for 'inability' or 'misbehaviour' by Lord Chancellor if the Lord Chief Justice agrees
Discipline:
More common than dismissal
Constitutional Reform Act 2005: gives Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice joint responsibility over advice, reprimands and warnings (before just Lord Chancellor)
Judge can be suspended pending investigation
Office for Judicial Complaints set up 2006
Retirement:
Retirement usually at 70, though allowed to work part-time until 75
Lord Chancellor has power to remove for infirmity
Independence of the judiciary:
Constitutional doctrine of the separation of powers requires judges to be independent from the executive & legislative arms
S.3 Constitutional Reform Act 2005:
“The Lord Chancellor and other Ministers for the Crown must not seek to influence a particular judicial decision”
Cut back Lord Chancellor's position in order to protect independence (Lord Chancellor is a politician)
Threats to independence:
Parliamentary sovereignty
Treasury counsel
Barristers who are retained to represent the Government in litigation are very likely to be offered HC judgeships
Cases with political implications
Liversidge v Anderson 1942: Lord Atkin levied criticism at the HL judges who agreed that the Home Sec. would not need to give reasons to detain citizens without charge – ‘more executive minded than the executive’
McIlkenny v Chief Constable of the West Midlands 1980: Lord Denning dismissed allegations of police brutality against 6 men accused of Birmingham pub bombings...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL English Legal System Notes.
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through applications from top students and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of GDL notes available in the UK this year....
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started