A more recent version of these Derivative Transfers notes – written by Oxford students – is available here.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Personal Property Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Derivative Transfers Transfers of title pursuant to a transaction with another person. The title of the transferee is created by the passing of ownership rights in the transaction and so, as it is not created by law, it is usually subject to the principle nemo dat quod non habet. The nemo dat principle is, simply, that a person is not able to pass better title than he had himself. The title transferred will generally have all the same weaknesses and defects as the title did when held by the transferor.
Importance of intention It is generally the intention of the transferor which causes the title to transfer effectively to the transferee. Intention is very formalised in its requirements in respect of a transfer of legal title. The intention must be fully formed in relation to the fundamental elements of the transaction transfer. The fundamental elements are: identity of the transferee; the subject matter being transferred; that the intention is to transfer ownership; where an asset is fungible then there must be an intention to transfer the particular quantity of fungible units
The sale of goods exception Where there is a contract for the sale of goods then the terms of the contract will be deemed to represent the intention (Sale of Goods Act 1979 s.17) Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods then title passes when the contract is made. It does not matter whether delivery or payment is postponed, title passes at the time the contract is made. (Sale of Goods Act 1979 s.18 Rule 1) Three important points in relation to sale of goods:
1. Title can pass without any delivery of goods. Outside the sale of goods context some effective delivery is necessary to pass title.
2. If the contract has failed, and is not void, then title will not have passed
3. Sale of Goods Act 1979 s.18 Rule 1 only applies to the transfer of goods. It does not apply to a transfer of money, the contract alone cannot pass title to money. There must be delivery for title to money to pass.
Transfers through a payment system A dematerialised transfer of money is different to a transfer of money in chattel form. It is more complicated, necessarily involving 3 or more parties instead of just 2. The transferor instructs his bank to credit the transferees bank account. But what actually happens is the transferor gives a mandate to his bank to pay money to the recipient and reduce the balance of the transferor's account accordingly. The transferor's bank pays
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Personal Property Law Notes.