Advanced Commercial Litigation
Judicial Review
Applying for Judicial Review
A claim for judicial review relates to the lawfulness of a decision made in public law. There are four grounds to establish judicial review:
Is the decision made by a public body?
Does the decision relate to the exercise of public functions/law?
Does the claimant have standing (i.e. direct personal interest, pressure groups or interested parties- CPR 54.1(1)(f))
Are the grounds satisfied:
Illegality - a public body is not allowed to act beyond its powers and covers ultra vires, misinterpreting the law, abuse of discretion, error of fact etc.
Irrationality - known as ‘Wednesbury Unreasonableness’ which relates to such unreasonableness that no reasonable authority would have made the decision.
Procedural Impropriety - this covers:
A failure to observe express procedural requirements (e.g. the right to be consulted/given notice)
A failure to observe the basic common rules of natural justice (e.g. duty to act fairly, bias etc.)
Procedure of Judicial Review
| Pre-Action:
|
|---|
| Commencement
|
| Permission
|
| Case Management
|
| The Hearing
|
| Damages & Remedies
- Damages can only be claimed if another remedy is sought and would have been awarded in a private case of action (CPR 54.3(2)) |
Tactical Issues for Judicial Review
Statutory Complaints Procedures
The courts should not allow judicial review proceedings to go ahead if there are statutory complaints procedures that the parties could use (e.g. the Independent Police Complaints Commission). The court should refuse permission if there are effective alternative remedies available to the claimant.
ADR &...